<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Post buys into anti-wireless rhetorics, fails.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thewavingcat.com/2007/02/12/washington-post-buys-into-anti-wireless-rhetorics-fails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thewavingcat.com/2007/02/12/washington-post-buys-into-anti-wireless-rhetorics-fails/</link>
	<description>[The Waving Cat: 'cause it's good luck AND shiny plastic]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:01:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t blame WiFi networks, focus &#187; Make You Go Hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.thewavingcat.com/2007/02/12/washington-post-buys-into-anti-wireless-rhetorics-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-10253</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t blame WiFi networks, focus &#187; Make You Go Hmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewavingcat.com/2007/02/12/washington-post-buys-into-anti-wireless-rhetorics-fails/#comment-10253</guid>
		<description>[...] The Waving Cat is disappointed with the article: What freaks me out is how badly research the article is. Not a single counterstatement, or alternative point of view to be found. Is this the same Washington Post thatâ€™s been around for ages and is well-known for good journalist practice?? Iâ€™m so sick of journalists buying one-sidedly into conservative policy rhetorics as far as technology is involved. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Waving Cat is disappointed with the article: What freaks me out is how badly research the article is. Not a single counterstatement, or alternative point of view to be found. Is this the same Washington Post thatâ€™s been around for ages and is well-known for good journalist practice?? Iâ€™m so sick of journalists buying one-sidedly into conservative policy rhetorics as far as technology is involved. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
